The book is currently out of stock
Parameters
- 400 pages
- 14 hours of reading
More about the book
In "Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature" Richard Rorty presented his vision of post-philosophical culture, calling upon professional philosophers to accept that epistemology is dead, that the analytic method is a myth, and that philosophy and science are merely forms of literature. This volume is an examination of the conclusions drawn by Richard Rorty. Discussions, by philosophers such as W.V. Cline, Donald Davidson, Bernard Williams, Charles Taylor, John Yolton and Martin Hollis, cover Rorty's views on truth, language, knowledge and the self, together with his pragmatism, his "continental turn" and his regard for the literary potential of philosophical writing.
Book purchase
Reading Rorty, Alan R. Malachowski
- Language
- Released
- 1990
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (Paperback)
We’ll email you as soon as we track it down.
Payment methods
No one has rated yet.
- Title
- Reading Rorty
- Subtitle
- Critical Responses to Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature and Beyond
- Language
- English
- Authors
- Alan R. Malachowski
- Publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- Released
- 1990
- Format
- Paperback
- Pages
- 400
- ISBN10
- 063116149X
- ISBN13
- 9780631161493
- Series
- Tags
- Non-Fiction, Social Sciences, Philosophical Topics, Philosophy, Linguistics, Knowledge, Truth, Philosophers, Pragmatism
- Description
- In "Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature" Richard Rorty presented his vision of post-philosophical culture, calling upon professional philosophers to accept that epistemology is dead, that the analytic method is a myth, and that philosophy and science are merely forms of literature. This volume is an examination of the conclusions drawn by Richard Rorty. Discussions, by philosophers such as W.V. Cline, Donald Davidson, Bernard Williams, Charles Taylor, John Yolton and Martin Hollis, cover Rorty's views on truth, language, knowledge and the self, together with his pragmatism, his "continental turn" and his regard for the literary potential of philosophical writing.