Explore the latest books of this year!
Bookbot

Six Thinking Hats

Save

Book rating

Parameters

  • 192 pages
  • 7 hours of reading

More about the book

The internationally bestselling guide to better thinking used by tens of thousands of people - fully revised and updated. The need for the Six Hats is based on an understanding of how the brain chemicals change with the mode of thinking. Using this method one major corporation reduced the time taken for multinational project discussions from thirty days to just two days. Argument is inefficient, ineffective and extremely slow. Argument was never designed to be constructive. The parallel thinking of the six hats is rapidly replacing argument around the world. For two-thousand-four-hundred years we have been content with argument which was never designed to be constructive. Discovering 'what is' may not be the same as designing 'what can be'.

Language

Publication

Book purchase

Six Thinking Hats, Edward de Bono

Language
Released
1999
Binding
(Paperback),
Book condition
Good
Price
€3.69

Payment methods

3.8
Very Good
99+ Ratings

We’re missing your review here.

Title
Six Thinking Hats
Language
English
Released
1999
Format
Paperback
Pages
192
ISBN10
0140296662
ISBN13
9780140296662
Series
First published
1985
Original title
Six Thinking Hats
Rating
3.75 out of 5
Description
The internationally bestselling guide to better thinking used by tens of thousands of people - fully revised and updated. The need for the Six Hats is based on an understanding of how the brain chemicals change with the mode of thinking. Using this method one major corporation reduced the time taken for multinational project discussions from thirty days to just two days. Argument is inefficient, ineffective and extremely slow. Argument was never designed to be constructive. The parallel thinking of the six hats is rapidly replacing argument around the world. For two-thousand-four-hundred years we have been content with argument which was never designed to be constructive. Discovering 'what is' may not be the same as designing 'what can be'.