The Lochnercourt, Myth and Reality

Challenging the conventional narrative, this examination of the Lochner Court reveals a more nuanced understanding of its decisions regarding substantive due process from 1897 to 1937. The book argues that the Court was less obstructive to Progressive legislation than typically thought, overturning fewer laws and not exclusively targeting social reforms. It highlights the complexity of the Court's rulings, including the unexpected support from Justice Holmes, often seen as a dissenter, who participated in many decisions against government actions.