Georg Schilling Book order

The book critiques the glorification of classical philosophers like Kant, Hegel, and Hume in university ethics courses, arguing for a more nuanced presentation of their ideas, particularly regarding their views on marginalized groups. It highlights the need for critical engagement with these thinkers, suggesting that students should be made aware of alternative voices, such as Anton Wilhelm Amo, who faced prejudice despite his significant contributions. The work questions whether uncritical acceptance of these philosophers enhances or undermines democratic values in Austria.

The book critically examines Immanuel Kant's philosophy, revealing prejudiced and unscientific views often overlooked in traditional interpretations. It aims to present a more grounded perspective on Kant, highlighting his problematic statements about women and marginalized groups, including Afro-Europeans. Additionally, it explores the writings of other philosophers like Hegel, Fichte, Hume, Rousseau, and Voltaire, addressing their totalitarian and racist sentiments. The text also critiques how contemporary scholarship may inadvertently glorify these figures while neglecting their controversial legacies, especially in light of historical atrocities like the Holocaust.

The document explores the often one-sided portrayal of Immanuel Kant in academic settings, particularly regarding his views on women, Afro-Americans, and Jewish minorities. It questions why students are predominantly exposed to Kant's positive contributions while neglecting the more problematic aspects of his philosophy. Additionally, it examines the perspectives of Kant's contemporaries, like Prof Dr Anton Wilhelm Amo, and challenges the notion of Kant as merely a "master of critical thinking," urging a more nuanced understanding of his legacy in the context of gender and race.

Exploring the philosophical legacies of Anton Wilhelm Amo and Immanuel Kant, this document critically examines the reputations of these figures, questioning the trustworthiness of Kant and others like de las Casas. It highlights the importance of skepticism towards widely accepted narratives in philosophy and law. The text reflects on a discussion initiated by Prof. Dr. Martin Spitzer and serves as a tribute to the author's late relative, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of historical figures often presented in a simplified manner.

The book critically examines the portrayal of prominent figures in German legal science, such as Karl Larenz and Immanuel Kant, questioning their almost reverential status in academic circles. It highlights concerns raised by scholars like Wimmer, Firla, and Hentges about the lack of scrutiny regarding these 'semi-divine' thinkers and their contributions. The discussion extends to the implications of Holocaust-related themes, urging a reevaluation of how these influential figures are presented in legal education and scholarship, advocating for a more critical and nuanced perspective.