This landmark legal case shines a light on the struggle for fair wages in the early 20th century. Through a series of legal battles, the Children's Hospital of the District of Columbia fought for the right to pay fair wages to its employees, paving the way for minimum wage legislation.
The correspondence between Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes and political theorist Harold J. Laski provides insights into their intellectual exchanges and differing perspectives on law, politics, and society. This volume captures their discussions, reflecting the historical context of early 20th-century America and the evolution of legal and political thought during that period. The letters reveal the personal and professional dynamics between two influential figures, shedding light on their contributions to American jurisprudence and political discourse.
The correspondence between Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes and political theorist Harold J. Laski offers a unique insight into their intellectual exchanges and differing viewpoints on law, politics, and society. This volume captures their dialogue, reflecting the complexities of early 20th-century thought and the interplay between legal philosophy and political ideology. Their letters reveal personal and professional dynamics that shaped their respective legacies, making this collection a significant resource for understanding their contributions to American jurisprudence and political theory.
The book explores the influential role of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. in shaping the Supreme Court and American jurisprudence. It delves into his legal philosophy, landmark opinions, and the broader implications of his contributions to constitutional law. Through an analysis of his decisions and their impact on civil liberties, the narrative highlights Holmes's legacy as one of the most significant figures in American legal history.
Focusing on the commerce clause, this study delves into its significant role in shaping the interactions between government and economic enterprises. It explores how the Supreme Court mediates the competing interests of the nation and states, highlighting the varying interpretations under three prominent chief justices. Originally published in 1937, this work offers a clear analysis of the legal landscape surrounding the commerce clause and its implications for federalism and economic regulation.
The Case for the Shorter Work Day Franklin O. Bunting, Plaintiff in Error, Vs. the State of Oregon, Defendant in Error. Brief for the Defendant in Error Felix Frankfurter of Counsel for the State of Oregon, Assisted by Josephine Goldmark New York, National Consumers League Hours of labor Labor laws and legislation -- Oregon Fatigue This is an OCR reprint. There may be numerous typos or missing text. There are no illustrations or indexes. When you buy the General Books edition of this book you get free trial access to Million-Books.com where you can select from more than a million books for free. You can also preview the book there.