The paper explores the ethical justification of individual moral obligations to combat climate change through the lens of Kant's categorical imperative. It examines the philosophical foundations of ethical action in relation to environmental issues, seeking to establish a framework for understanding how personal responsibility aligns with broader ethical principles. The analysis is rooted in practical philosophy, providing insights into the intersection of ethics, environmental responsibility, and individual agency.
Alexander Hölzl Book order






- 2020
- 2019
Challenging the prevalent notion among philosophers and scientists that free will is merely an illusion, this essay posits that free will can be understood as a potentiality that individuals can actualize. The author argues for the possibility of genuine moral responsibility tied to this interpretation of free will, presenting a nuanced perspective that invites readers to reconsider the implications of their actions and choices.