Brian Vickers Book order

Focusing on the life and works of Thomas Kyd, this study by Brian Vickers redefines Kyd's significance in Elizabethan drama. It not only examines his well-known plays, such as The Spanish Tragedy, but also introduces three newly attributed works: Arden of Faversham, King Leir, and Fair Em. Vickers supports these claims through evidence of thematic and linguistic similarities, highlighting Kyd's broader contributions to the genre, including his role in establishing domestic tragedy and influencing Shakespeare. The book provides a comprehensive reassessment of Kyd's legacy.

Exploring the biblical theology of justification, this work addresses the challenges faced by the doctrine of alien, imputed righteousness. It reveals how Scripture illustrates God's provision for sinners to attain righteousness through Christ. The book offers guidance for those grappling with issues like legalism, lawlessness, pride, or despair, emphasizing that a proper understanding of justification redirects focus from self to the complete acceptance found in God through Christ.

Focusing on the interplay between form and meaning, this collection explores the evolution of Shakespeare's plays and their reception over time. Originally published in 1989, it showcases Brian Vickers' significant contributions to Shakespeare criticism, offering revised and expanded insights from his work over the preceding fifteen years.

Conclusion: Toward a New Consensus -- Appendix 1: Illustrations and Commentary -- Appendix 2: Space Saving in Q1 King Lear -- Notes -- Index

The book delves into the authorship of two poems, providing a critical analysis that ultimately concludes neither can be attributed to Shakespeare. Vickers presents evidence and arguments that challenge traditional beliefs, offering readers insights into the complexities of literary attribution and the implications for understanding Shakespeare's body of work.

The analysis reveals that "A Lover's Complaint," included with Shakespeare's Sonnets, exhibits distinct differences in language and attitude towards women, suggesting it may not be authentically Shakespearean. Vickers argues it features awkward construction, archaic diction, and a moralizing, misogynistic view of female frailty, contrasting sharply with Shakespeare's style. Through detailed examination, Vickers attributes the poem to John Davies of Hereford, a noted calligrapher and poet, potentially reshaping the understanding of the Shakespearean canon.

Originally published in 1968 and revised in 1979, this book offers an updated perspective on its themes and content. The re-issue provides readers with a fresh look at the ideas presented, reflecting changes in thought and context since the original publication. This edition is ideal for both new readers and those revisiting the work, showcasing its enduring relevance and insights.

The book delves into the authorship debates surrounding two specific poems, providing a thorough analysis that ultimately concludes neither can be attributed to Shakespeare. Vickers presents evidence and arguments that challenge traditional assumptions, contributing to the ongoing discourse about literary attribution and the complexities of Shakespearean scholarship.

Thoughtful readers interested in the evolution of language will find this book particularly engaging. It delves into the history and development of the English language, offering insights into its transformation over time. The narrative explores linguistic changes, cultural influences, and the significance of language in shaping identity and communication.

Focusing on Shakespeare's collaborations, this study evaluates claims regarding his co-authorship of several plays, including Titus Andronicus and Henry VIII. It explores the processes of collaboration and the evolution of authorship studies since the early 1800s. Brian Vickers highlights a consistent tradition in attributing works to Shakespeare, providing a detailed analysis that sheds light on his partnerships with other dramatists.