Whom to blame - the source of information or myself?

More about the book

Modern information technologies, particularly the Internet, provide easy access to a vast array of science-based information, which can often be controversial or conflicting. This internal controversy is a normal aspect of scientific knowledge but contrasts sharply with public expectations of science. When faced with conflicting scientific evidence, individuals must find explanations for the contradictions they encounter. This work identifies and empirically examines two primary explanations for these contradictions: one is the belief that knowledge on the topic is inherently inconsistent or uncertain (linked to personal epistemology), and the other is the perception of one's inability to understand or integrate the conflicting information (related to personal ability). The five empirical studies presented focus on whether engagement with online information affects personal epistemology and ability assessments, particularly in the context of conflicting information. The studies specifically explore the search for medical information regarding the treatment and causes of high cholesterol, serving as a typical example of laypersons’ problem-specific Internet searches.