Patricia Etonde Book order

Focusing on the period from 1884 to 1916, the dissertation examines the impact of German colonial rule on the traditional powers of Duala and Bamum in Cameroon. It highlights the significant restructuring of their political, economic, and socio-cultural systems under colonial influence. The research also explores the reciprocal changes experienced by the German administration through interactions with local leaders, particularly Sultan NJOYA and Duala chiefs, offering a nuanced analysis of this socio-political dynamic in Cameroon’s history.

The essay explores the impact of German, French, and British colonization on the traditional political structures of the Bamoun and Duala communities in Cameroon. It examines how these groups adapted to the changes brought about by the emergence of the Cameroonian postcolonial state, focusing on local sociological factors like tribal affiliations and vernacular languages. The analysis highlights the resulting divisions and fragmentation within communities as they navigated the quest for national political resources.

The article explores the adaptation of German colonial administration to the traditional governance structures of the Bamoun people, focusing on the resistance led by the sovereign NJOYA against colonial rule. It delves into the dynamics between colonial powers and indigenous leadership, highlighting the complexities of governance during the colonial period in Europe. Through this examination, the piece sheds light on the interplay of rebellion and adaptation in the context of colonialism.

The narrative explores the lineage and political dynamics of a royal family in Africa, focusing on Prince NSANGOU's rise to power as the 15th king, following the expulsion of the usurper "Mfon" NGOUWOU. It highlights the significance of lineage, as NJOYA, the son of NSANGOU and grandson of NJIMOLUH SEIDOU NJOYA, inherits a legacy tied to notable ancestors. Following NSANGOU's death in battle around 1889, NJOYA ascends to the throne during his minority, with his mother, NJAPDOUNKÉ, acting as regent, supported by the loyal servant GBENTKOM NDOMBOUO.

The book explores the impact of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, which marked the end of the German protectorate and the beginning of the French mandate in Cameroon. It examines how this transition affected local political structures, particularly the traditional authorities of the Bamoun and Duala peoples, highlighting the challenges and transformations they faced during this significant period of colonial history.

The book explores the complex interactions between the German colonial administration and the traditional political powers of Bamoun and Douala from 1884 to 1916. It highlights the significant restructuring of their political, economic, and socio-cultural organizations due to colonial influence. The analysis emphasizes the mutual impact of this relationship, detailing how German officials adapted to local realities while examining the traditional leaders' roles in the colonial context. Employing historical and comparative methodologies, the work seeks to illuminate the dynamics of colonial domination and the evolution of these societies.

The paper explores international mobility as a form of occupational change, focusing on the temporary relocation of individuals, specifically Cameroonian expatriates. It examines the phenomenon of expatriation and addresses the social protection measures in place for expatriates within the context of global mobility. By analyzing these aspects, the study highlights the complexities and implications of working abroad, emphasizing the need for effective support systems for expatriates.

Focusing on the nuances of the Treaty of 12 July 1884, the author argues that it was primarily an agreement between German private entities and Duala princes rather than a formal treaty between states. The analysis highlights discrepancies between the Preliminary and Final Treaties, particularly the exclusion of key clauses that protected the Duala leaders' commercial rights. Additionally, the final agreement lacked unanimous ratification from all Duala sovereigns, raising questions about its legitimacy and impact on local governance.