Grenzen der Interpretation in Hermeneutik und Psychoanalyse

More about the book

The book features a collection of essays exploring the intricate relationship between psychoanalysis and various philosophical paradigms. It begins with a foreword by H. Lang, discussing the hermeneutics of empathy, followed by P. Dybel's examination of the scientific status of psychoanalysis through three paradigms: natural science, hermeneutic-existential, and structuralist. T. Storck presents psychoanalysis as a form of negative hermeneutics, while E. Kobylinska-Dehe addresses the concept of decontainment in relation to psychoanalysis. M. H. Kowalewicz critiques the confusion surrounding the intersection of worldview and psychoanalysis in analytical practice. A. Kraus applies Sartre's existential psychoanalysis to melancholic and hysterical patients, and G. Pagel explores the similarities and differences between Sartre and Lacan. M. Bürgy delves into the hermeneutics of depressive despair, while H. Weiss discusses grievance and the challenge of feeling understood in borderline analysis. R. Heim reflects on the significance of the signifier in psychoanalytic hermeneutics, and E. Seifert contrasts psychoanalysis with neuroscience. S. Wróbel contemplates the complexities of mastering the Oedipus complex, and M. Drwie? ga investigates the connection between Paul Ricoeur and psychoanalysis. A. Leder examines Freud in light of Kantian synthetic unity, and A. Wiercinski questions the limits of interpretation within hermeneutics an