Dr. Thomas W. Hilgers is a pioneer in the field of reproductive medicine, dedicated to advancing women's health through innovative approaches. His extensive research has led to the development of the Creighton Model FertilityCareTM System and the groundbreaking women’s health science of NaProTechnology. Dr. Hilgers' work emphasizes a natural and scientifically-grounded understanding of human fertility and reproductive well-being. He is a respected figure whose contributions aim to provide ethical and effective solutions in reproductive health.
The book presents a novel perspective on aesthetic disinterestedness, building on the theories of Kant, Schopenhauer, and Bullough. It argues that artworks engage both our senses and imagination, necessitating a disinterested approach to fully appreciate their presentation. Hilgers explores the implications of this stance for understanding art and its impact on viewers.
Over the last 50 or 60 years, there has appeared a directional shift in the medical and social culture of the United States. We see it in the news programs every night, sometimes several times a night. Often there are generic reasons given for these changes such as "poverty and hopelessness." But could there be other reasons? Could the medical profession be playing an important role in the violence and destructiveness of this cultural shift? Has there been any critical self-examination by the medical profession which usually demands evidence-based conclusions to be assessed? Or are there some questions that are too difficult for individuals to investigate, not because it's impossible to investigate them, but because it can be painful and because the attitudes of a collective group of colleagues may be preventing these questions from being asked? It is as if we have BLINDERS on! This book makes an attempt to address some new questions that have rarely been asked but should be. This book, with a full-color interior, takes an objective look at data that has been produced by mostly government-based statistical gathering systems, some published in peer-reviewed medical journals and even some in news reports.
Our schools and healthcare institutions have abandoned the Hippocratic Oath and the Declaration of Geneva and replaced it with a policy of lethalism ... This is a direct result of the Court's acceptance and promotion of archaic scientific reasoning (Roe v. Wade) that, at best, would be considered pre-medieval and clearly out of touch with scientific reality. Fallout includes the expansion into fetal experimentation, human cloning, embryonic stem cell research, infanticide, and even physician-assisted suicide programs. The respect for life ethic has slowly been removed as the Supreme Court has so strongly supported the lethalism it becomes a way of life. Especially interesting is the lack of support for any positive solutions to these issues. The recognition is that life at all stages in the womb is precious and able to make extraordinary contributions to our ability to love and to be loved, to bring about peace and to be at peace, to extract love in ways that only a very young and precious life is able to extract, and to express love in ways that can be boundlessly meaningful. As we move to reestablish the human right to live, we must also move beyond lethalism and install positive, life-affirming and meaningful solutions to real human problems. God bless us all as we move in this direction! -- Back cover