Stanley Fish focuses on well-known movies (such as Anatomy of a Murder, Twelve Angry Men, or A Man for All Seasons) that take law as their subject, and explains how legal doctrine is made into the stuff of plot and character. A book for movie lovers written in an accessible and engaging style.
Stanley Fish Book order (chronological)
April 19, 1938
Stanley Fish is an American literary theorist and legal scholar, often associated with postmodernism, though he describes himself as an anti-foundationalist. His work focuses on the critical examination of texts and interpretations, exploring how meanings are constructed and how they shape our understanding of the world. Fish's approach is known for its provocative nature and emphasis on the idea that there are no universal truths, only interpretive communities.
Der amerikanische Literaturwissenschaftler Stanley Fish gilt wegen seines antifundamentalistischen Pragmatismus als »enfant terrible« der akademischen Welt. Zugleich ist er aber ein bedeutender Essayist in bester angelsächsischer Tradition, der in Deutschland noch zu entdecken ist. Der Band versammelt eine Auswahl seiner Essays, die von den frühen Arbeiten zur Literaturtheorie und Sprachphilosophie bis zu den späteren über das Recht, die Rechtsinterpretation und den Rechtspositivismus reicht. Fish provoziert. Sein Werk ist kein Plädoyer für eine bestimmte rechtliche Ordnung und auch keines für eine Befreiung von dieser, sondern die Beschreibung einer Welt, in der Rhetorik, Verschleierung und Improvisation vorherrschen.
Dvě interdisciplinární studie zkoumají roli kontextu při utváření významu.
Doing What Comes Naturally
- 624 pages
- 22 hours of reading
"In literary theory, the philosophy of law, and the sociology of knowledge, no issue has been more central to current debate than the status of our interpretations. Do they rest on a ground of rationality or are they subjective impositions of a merely personal point of view? In Doing What Comes Naturally, Stanley Fish refuses the dilemma posed by this question and argues that while we can never separate our judgments from the contexts in which they are made, those judgments are nevertheless authoritative and even, in the only way that matters, objective. He thus rejects both the demand for an ahistorical foundation, and the conclusion that in the absence of such a foundation we reside in an indeterminate world. In a succession of provocative and wide-ranging chapters, Fish explores the implications of his position for our understanding of legal, literary, and psychoanalytic interpretation, the nature of professional and institutional culture, and the place of reason in a world that is rhetorical through and through."--Publisher description.