Explore the latest books of this year!
Bookbot

A comparative study on the theological methodology of Irenaeus of Lyon and Sankaracharya

Parameters

  • 379 pages
  • 14 hours of reading

More about the book

Irenaeus of Lyon, a bishop who lived at the end of the second century and is recorded among the fathers of the Christian church, developed criteria for the understanding of biblical texts. These biblical texts were recognized as writings of divine revelation both by him and by contemporary Christian gnostic teachers with whose interpretations he was at variance. The Indian philosopher Sankara lived in an age closely resembling the European Early Middle Ages. He explained traditional texts of the Veda in a non-dualistic way that differed from other Hindu teachers thus presenting - like Irenaeus - a divine unity that transgresses all tensions. A comparison of the methods used by the two thinkers helps to understand both Christian and Hindu tradition. The author's aim is not primarily to establish differences but to invite dialogue.

Book purchase

A comparative study on the theological methodology of Irenaeus of Lyon and Sankaracharya, Thomas Puttanil

Language
Released
1990
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(Paperback)
We’ll email you as soon as we track it down.

Payment methods

No one has rated yet.Add rating

Title
A comparative study on the theological methodology of Irenaeus of Lyon and Sankaracharya
Language
English
Publisher
Peter Lang
Released
1990
Format
Paperback
Pages
379
ISBN10
3631419708
ISBN13
9783631419700
Series
Description
Irenaeus of Lyon, a bishop who lived at the end of the second century and is recorded among the fathers of the Christian church, developed criteria for the understanding of biblical texts. These biblical texts were recognized as writings of divine revelation both by him and by contemporary Christian gnostic teachers with whose interpretations he was at variance. The Indian philosopher Sankara lived in an age closely resembling the European Early Middle Ages. He explained traditional texts of the Veda in a non-dualistic way that differed from other Hindu teachers thus presenting - like Irenaeus - a divine unity that transgresses all tensions. A comparison of the methods used by the two thinkers helps to understand both Christian and Hindu tradition. The author's aim is not primarily to establish differences but to invite dialogue.