More about the book
Based on the Tanner lectures delivered by Justice Stephen Breyer at Harvard in November 2004, this book defines “active liberty” as the sharing of sovereign authority between the nation and its citizens. Breyer views the Constitution not as a rigid legal framework but as a living guide that adapts to a changing society. He emphasizes that the Constitution's true genius lies in its principles' ability to address contemporary issues rather than adhering to a static interpretation. Through examples in free speech, federalism, privacy, affirmative action, statutory interpretation, and administrative law, Breyer argues that courts should recognize the Constitution’s democratic nature when interpreting texts. He asserts that citizens must engage in community life to gain the experience needed for self-governance. Breyer's unique perspective in the federalism debate posits that deference to congressional power can enhance democratic participation. He contends that, despite its imperfections, Congress has effectively balanced diverse citizen views, especially during crises, better than the executive or judicial branches. With a nuanced understanding of complexity, Breyer advocates for Congress as the appropriate forum for resolving policy disputes, making a significant declaration about democracy and governance.
Publication
Book purchase
Active Liberty, Stephen Breyer
- Language
- Released
- 2005
- Binding
- (Hardcover),
- Book condition
- Good
- Price
- €11.99
Payment methods
We’re missing your review here.
- Title
- Active Liberty
- Subtitle
- Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution
- Language
- English
- Authors
- Stephen Breyer
- Publisher
- Knopf
- Released
- 2005
- Format
- Hardcover
- Pages
- 176
- ISBN10
- 0307263134
- ISBN13
- 9780307263131
- Series
- Categories
- Rating
- 3.5 out of 5
- Description
- Based on the Tanner lectures delivered by Justice Stephen Breyer at Harvard in November 2004, this book defines “active liberty” as the sharing of sovereign authority between the nation and its citizens. Breyer views the Constitution not as a rigid legal framework but as a living guide that adapts to a changing society. He emphasizes that the Constitution's true genius lies in its principles' ability to address contemporary issues rather than adhering to a static interpretation. Through examples in free speech, federalism, privacy, affirmative action, statutory interpretation, and administrative law, Breyer argues that courts should recognize the Constitution’s democratic nature when interpreting texts. He asserts that citizens must engage in community life to gain the experience needed for self-governance. Breyer's unique perspective in the federalism debate posits that deference to congressional power can enhance democratic participation. He contends that, despite its imperfections, Congress has effectively balanced diverse citizen views, especially during crises, better than the executive or judicial branches. With a nuanced understanding of complexity, Breyer advocates for Congress as the appropriate forum for resolving policy disputes, making a significant declaration about democracy and governance.



