Explore the latest books of this year!
Bookbot

Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Volume 99

Authors

  • Various authors

Book rating

Parameters

  • 425 pages
  • 15 hours of reading

More about the book

Volume 99 of Harvard Studies in Classical Philology includes the following Nancy Felson, “Vicarious Fictive Deixis in Pindar’s Pythian Four”; Douglas E. Gerber, “Pindar, Nemean A Commentary”; Jennifer Clarke Kosak, “Therapeutic Touch and Sophokles’ Philoktetes ”; F. S. Naiden, “The Prospective Imperfect in Herodotus”; Thomas A. Schmitz, “‘I Hate All Common Things’: The Reader’s Role in Callimachus’ Aetia Prologue”; Dimitrios Yatromanolakis, “Alexandrian Sappho Revisited”; John T. Ramsey, “Mithridates, the Banner of Ch’ih-yu, and the Comet Coin”; Alexander Jones, “Geminus and the Isia”; Benjamin Victor, “Further Remarks on the Andria of Terence”; Peter E. Knox, “Lucretius on the Narrow Road”; Francis Cairns, “Virgil Eclogue 1.1–2: A Literary Programme?”; Michael Hendry, “ Epidaurus, Epirus,…Epidamnus? Vergil Georgics 3.44”; Charles Segal, “Ovid’s Meleager and the Trials of Gender and Genre”; John Hunt, “Readings in Apollonius of Tyre ”; Bernard Frischer et al., “Word-Order Transference between Latin and The Relative Position of the Accusative Direct Object and the Governing Verb in Cassius Dio and Other Greek and Roman Prose Authors”; and Craig Kallendorf, “Historicizing the ‘Harvard School’: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Italian Renaissance Scholarship.”

Book purchase

Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Volume 99, Various authors

Language
Released
1999
Binding
(Hardcover)
We’ll email you as soon as we track it down.

Payment methods

5.0
Excellent
1 Ratings

We’re missing your review here.

Title
Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Volume 99
Language
English
Released
1999
Format
Hardcover
Pages
425
ISBN10
0674379470
ISBN13
9780674379473
Series
Rating
5 out of 5
Description
Volume 99 of Harvard Studies in Classical Philology includes the following Nancy Felson, “Vicarious Fictive Deixis in Pindar’s Pythian Four”; Douglas E. Gerber, “Pindar, Nemean A Commentary”; Jennifer Clarke Kosak, “Therapeutic Touch and Sophokles’ Philoktetes ”; F. S. Naiden, “The Prospective Imperfect in Herodotus”; Thomas A. Schmitz, “‘I Hate All Common Things’: The Reader’s Role in Callimachus’ Aetia Prologue”; Dimitrios Yatromanolakis, “Alexandrian Sappho Revisited”; John T. Ramsey, “Mithridates, the Banner of Ch’ih-yu, and the Comet Coin”; Alexander Jones, “Geminus and the Isia”; Benjamin Victor, “Further Remarks on the Andria of Terence”; Peter E. Knox, “Lucretius on the Narrow Road”; Francis Cairns, “Virgil Eclogue 1.1–2: A Literary Programme?”; Michael Hendry, “ Epidaurus, Epirus,…Epidamnus? Vergil Georgics 3.44”; Charles Segal, “Ovid’s Meleager and the Trials of Gender and Genre”; John Hunt, “Readings in Apollonius of Tyre ”; Bernard Frischer et al., “Word-Order Transference between Latin and The Relative Position of the Accusative Direct Object and the Governing Verb in Cassius Dio and Other Greek and Roman Prose Authors”; and Craig Kallendorf, “Historicizing the ‘Harvard School’: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Italian Renaissance Scholarship.”