Explore the latest books of this year!
Bookbot

Signs and Meaning in the Cinema

Parameters

  • 168 pages
  • 6 hours of reading

More about the book

First published in 1969, *Signs and Meaning in the Cinema* transformed the emerging discipline of film studies. Remarkably eclectic and informed, Peter Wollen's highly influential and groundbreaking work remains a brilliant and accessible theorization of film as an art form and as a sign system. The book is divided into three main sections. The first explores the work of Sergei Eisenstein as filmmaker, designer, and aesthetician. The second, which contains a celebrated comparison of the films of John Ford and Howard Hawks, is an exposition and defense of the auteur theory. The third formulates a semiology of the cinema, invoking cinema as an exemplary test case for comparative aesthetics and general theories of signification. Wollen's conclusion argues for an avant-garde cinema, bringing post-structuralist ideas into his discussion of Godard and other contemporaries.

Book purchase

Signs and Meaning in the Cinema, Peter Wollen

Language
Released
1970
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(Paperback)
We’ll email you as soon as we track it down.

Payment methods

No one has rated yet.Add rating

Title
Signs and Meaning in the Cinema
Language
English
Format
Paperback
Pages
168
ISBN10
0500480028
ISBN13
9780500480021
Series
Description
First published in 1969, *Signs and Meaning in the Cinema* transformed the emerging discipline of film studies. Remarkably eclectic and informed, Peter Wollen's highly influential and groundbreaking work remains a brilliant and accessible theorization of film as an art form and as a sign system. The book is divided into three main sections. The first explores the work of Sergei Eisenstein as filmmaker, designer, and aesthetician. The second, which contains a celebrated comparison of the films of John Ford and Howard Hawks, is an exposition and defense of the auteur theory. The third formulates a semiology of the cinema, invoking cinema as an exemplary test case for comparative aesthetics and general theories of signification. Wollen's conclusion argues for an avant-garde cinema, bringing post-structuralist ideas into his discussion of Godard and other contemporaries.