Explore the latest books of this year!
Bookbot

Militarizing Sri Lanka

Popular Culture, Memory and Narrative in the Armed Conflict

Parameters

  • 330 pages
  • 12 hours of reading

More about the book

Militarizing Sri Lanka is a study of the militarization that has buttressed the war between the Sri Lankan state and the LTTE for over two decades. It highlights militarization as a process through which the ideology of militarism is shaped and shared in a manner that makes militant solutions to conflict a part of institutional structures and ways of thought. It foregrounds militarization as activity and agency, capable of adaptation and transforming society in significant ways; and as a deeply gendered, contingent and shifting process. It also analyzes both the construction and resistance to militarization and militarism, but in a manner that draws attention to their relationality rather than as self-evidently oppositional categories.

Book purchase

Militarizing Sri Lanka, Neloufer de Mel

Language
Released
2007
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(Paperback),
Book condition
Damaged
Price
€26.37

Payment methods

No one has rated yet.Add rating

Subtitle
Popular Culture, Memory and Narrative in the Armed Conflict
Language
English
Released
2007
Format
Paperback
Pages
330
ISBN10
0761936351
ISBN13
9780761936350
Series
Tags
Description
Militarizing Sri Lanka is a study of the militarization that has buttressed the war between the Sri Lankan state and the LTTE for over two decades. It highlights militarization as a process through which the ideology of militarism is shaped and shared in a manner that makes militant solutions to conflict a part of institutional structures and ways of thought. It foregrounds militarization as activity and agency, capable of adaptation and transforming society in significant ways; and as a deeply gendered, contingent and shifting process. It also analyzes both the construction and resistance to militarization and militarism, but in a manner that draws attention to their relationality rather than as self-evidently oppositional categories.